Intentional killing. Legal frameworks for State-sponsored biochemical warfare.

LET THE SCIENCE SPEAK Conference
Presenter: Katherine Watt, American Catholic writer and paralegal
Reykjavik, Iceland – Oct. 4, 2023
Bailiwick News

This is a hyperlink-referenced version of Katherine Watt’s presentation leveraging her slide set from the Let The Science Speak Conference, held in Reykjavik, Iceland on 4 October 2023.

Treaties: WHO International Health Reg (2005)

Two main reports: Legal Walls of the Covid-19 Kill Box (Feb. 2022) [Jan 2023 slides, 18 pp., 2005 International Health Regulations] and American Domestic Bioterrorism Program (April 2022)
Legal Walls – global framework, UN (1945), WHO (1946)
- Attorney Todd Callender explains the legal framework for suspension of human rights and civil liberties globally – Set in motion by Bank for International Settlements[††][†††] in 1990, ratified by national governments in 2005, implemented in 2020 with “WHO-declared pandemic.” 31 Jan 2022
- January 19, 2017 Federal Register – US Health and Human Services final rulemaking, WHO International Health Regulations, and human liberty. 2 Feb 2022
  op. cit. IHR is “binding instrument of international law”
- More on the International Health Regulations – Bipartisan Presidential Executive Orders in 2003, 2005, and 2014 authorized the Secretary of Health and Human Services to detain Americans on suspicion of having colds and flus. 3 Feb 2022
- How the International Health Regulations, voiding constitutional and statutory law in signatory nation-states… – underpin de facto public health martial law in Pennsylvania. 4 Feb 2022
ADBP – Timeline of US changes in law, from 1944 Public Health Service Act, through 1983 ‘public health emergencies’ program, through Project Bioshield Act (2004), PREP Act (2005).
Development of this parallel military-public health emergency law ongoing.

Public health emergencies are pretexts for power consolidation and legalized mass murder using State-sponsored biochemical warfare and weapons camouflaged as ‘vaccines,’ ‘countermeasures.’

Observed, recorded global injuries and deaths of human beings are result of INTENTIONAL ACTS OF WAR camouflaged as public health programs and medical countermeasures: ‘vaccines’ and many others.
Deepen the backlash against public health. A rebuttal/reworking of an editorial by Lawrence O. Gostin and Sarah Wetter, published March 30, 2023 by Science journal. Apr 2023
Supported by evidence from funeral directors, embalmers (O’Looney[ref][ref][ref]); clinical trials (Jackson[ref][ref][ref]); regulatory/FDA lot and batch toxicity (Yeadon[ref][ref][ref], Paardekooper[ref][ref][ref][ref][ref], Latypova[ref][ref][ref][ref], Schmeling[ref][ref][ref], McKernan[ref][ref][ref][ref]); financial (Austin Fitts[ref][ref][ref][ref], Titus[ref][ref][ref]); VAERS; many other evidence collections and analysts.

Pope Pius XII, On the Moral Limits of Medical Research and Treatment (1952, post-Nuremberg):“[I]nsofar as the moral justification of the experiments rests on the mandate of the public authority, and therefore on the subordination of the individual to the community, of the individual’s welfare to the common welfare, it is based on an erroneous explanation of this principle. It must be noted that, in his personal being, man is not finally ordered to usefulness to society. On the contrary, the community exists for man.” †
Totalitarianism – Perversion of “common good.”
† That’s the sort of distinction that we’re dealing with now. Because the totalitarians at the World Economic Forum and Bank for International Settlements[††][†††] pervert the concept of the common good to say that individuals are subordinate to the common good and that you can do anything you want to up to and including killing them if you can make a case — or if you can get enough people to believe — that that’s good for the planet or it’s good for the control of this coronavirus or whatever. Restoring the proper understanding of the purpose of society and how man fits with it is really important.”